Most mills do not switch to spray-applied starch because it is novel — they switch because a specific problem keeps showing up on the production floor: weak top liners, dusting at the slitter, or a cross-machine strength profile that will not even out no matter how the wet end is adjusted. Spray starch tends to solve a narrow set of problems very well, which is why it has stayed a standard tool in paper and board mills for decades.
Wet-end addition is usually the cheaper option per kilogram of starch used, but a meaningful share of it never bonds to fiber and instead leaves the system in white water, which is both a cost loss and an effluent load increase. Spray-applied starch, by contrast, lands directly where it is needed, so mills typically see a better strength response per kilogram applied, even though the spray-grade starch itself may need more modification (lower viscosity, finer particle size) to perform well through nozzles.
In practice, many mills run both: a baseline wet-end addition for bulk strength, with spray application layered on top for targeted correction where the basic recipe falls short.
Spray systems are unforgiving of inconsistency. A starch batch that cooks out a little thicker than usual, or has a wider particle size distribution than the last delivery, shows up immediately as nozzle clogging or streaking on the sheet. When evaluating a supplier, mills typically look at:
Not usually. Most mills use spray starch alongside wet-end addition, with spraying used for targeted correction rather than as the sole source of sheet strength.
Consistent surface strength reduces failures like edge crush and burst strength at the converting stage, which are common reasons board gets rejected before it reaches the customer.
Per kilogram, spray-grade starch can cost more due to the modification needed for clean nozzle application, but mills often see better strength return per kilogram because less is lost to the white water system.